
Should celebrities be allowed to trademark their child's name??
This snippet is taken from Drew Reports.com:
Beyonce and Jay-Z want to control any green made off their beloved baby Blue. The proud parents filed a Jan. 26 application to trademark the name “Blue Ivy Carter,” their infant daughter’s now world-famous moniker. Queen B and her rap mogul hubby are asking for exclusive rights to use the name in connection with cosmetics, recordings, baby products, clothing, toys, video games and motion picture films, according to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office website.
First off I have no idea who Jay-Z is. I couldn't pick him out of a crowd if my life depended on it. All I know is that he has something to do with Beyonce. Truth be told I wouldn't know who she was either if it weren't for the Weight Watcher's commercials.
BUT!! Should celebrities be allowed to trademark their child's name? Personally, I think Blue Ivy is a stupid name for a child . . . Ivy not so much, but Blue Ivy . . . yeah . . . dumb name. I'll never understand why people have to name their kids such stupid names. What's wrong with a name that won't get your kid made fun of when they go to school??
[If celebrities think that their kid won't get made fun of because of who their parents are they've got another think coming. It's just my personal opinion, but kids of celebrities are more susceptible than non-celebrity kids. I mean c'mon . . . wouldn't you razz a kid because his or her father was Charlie Sheen?]
I may be wrong, but I don't think you can trademark a name to prevent anyone else from using it as a name for their child. If that were the case, then our names would be numbers now instead of words. I think as long as it's for business purposes only, then it should be okay . . . IF (and ONLY IF) that business is already formed. Try to imagine naming your company Microsoft or Apple.
If the parents set out to prevent others from using the name for their kid then it would piss me off. That would be like the Catholic Church trademarking the names of the gospels in the bible. Imagine not being able to name your kid Matthew, Mark, Luke, John . . . or Job!! LOL
When a celebrity states that their trademark application is for business purposes only . . . to use their kid's name only in relation to a business venture . . . is really suspect. I didn't have my kids because I was expecting to use them or their names in a possible business venture. I had my kids because I wanted kids. Not because I was expecting to make money off of them at some point in the future.
Maybe I'll come up with a business that has nothing to do with cosmetics, recordings, baby products, clothing, toys, video games and motion picture films and call it Blue Ivy Crochet Company. Yeah . . . why not?? :)

Please keep in mind that what I write on this blog is my own opinion and not that of anyone else on this planet. If you agree with me . . . that's totally cool. If you don't . . . that's cool too. If you want to post your own opinion feel free to do so, but please be nice and try and keep the cussin' to a minimum.


















